Why does everyone say Man United have lots of match winning players a Liverpool dont?
Besides players like rooney gerrard torres.
United have players like carrick anderson park fletcher brown neville scholes. who are not match winning players, then Liverpool, theres the likes of reira benayoun kuyt mascherano babel auerelio and now johnson. i think liverpool have many more match winning players and a lot stronger squad.
anyone agree
personally i haven’t heard anyone saying that, all i have heard is that Man Utd have more depth to their squad and that is a completely objective opinion as it all depends on how you rate the players in each team, so we could sit here all night arguing that one!
if you’re going to make a comparison please feel free to make a fair one, apart from Carrick (and maybe Fletcher) the players you have chosen from Man Utd are all fringe players
games played;
Carrick - 28
Anderson - 17
Park - 25
Fletcher - 26
Brown - 8
Neville - 16
Scholes - 21
not one of those players started more than 25 games, you’ve chosen 2 defenders who started less than 20 games between them in Brown and Neville.
Also of the players you have chosen for Liverpool you have 4 attacking players and 2 attacking full-backs and one defensive player in Mascherano again hardly a fair comparison when compared to the players you have chosen from Man Utd! It seems to me you have purposely chosen players from Man Utd that back up your point, why didn’t you pick the likes of Giggs, Valencia, Owen, Rafael (played more than Brown and the same as Neville), Evra, Vidic (how many games did he win for us last season) and even Nani!
















i agree.
References :
Yes. I agree completely.
Only a complete retard would argue with you.
(Now lets see how many there are…)
References :
How many players scored for Liverpool last season?What was the goals
and point difference?Fan of neither and don’t know.But i do know M.U won
the title.
References :
OK f–k of yh man u
u compare man u to Liverpool or losserpool should i say
References :
reira benayoun kuyt mascherano babel auerelio and johnson are match winners and Scholes is not, did you sell your brain for jelly-beans?
References :
i completly disagree
References :
i agree manu rule
References :
personally i haven’t heard anyone saying that, all i have heard is that Man Utd have more depth to their squad and that is a completely objective opinion as it all depends on how you rate the players in each team, so we could sit here all night arguing that one!
if you’re going to make a comparison please feel free to make a fair one, apart from Carrick (and maybe Fletcher) the players you have chosen from Man Utd are all fringe players
games played;
Carrick - 28
Anderson - 17
Park - 25
Fletcher - 26
Brown - 8
Neville - 16
Scholes - 21
not one of those players started more than 25 games, you’ve chosen 2 defenders who started less than 20 games between them in Brown and Neville.
Also of the players you have chosen for Liverpool you have 4 attacking players and 2 attacking full-backs and one defensive player in Mascherano again hardly a fair comparison when compared to the players you have chosen from Man Utd! It seems to me you have purposely chosen players from Man Utd that back up your point, why didn’t you pick the likes of Giggs, Valencia, Owen, Rafael (played more than Brown and the same as Neville), Evra, Vidic (how many games did he win for us last season) and even Nani!
References :
all im gonna say is, with gerrard, carragher, skrtel and aquilini out surs r ga beat liverpool this sunday, watch out! defoe for a hat trick. and yeah ma utd dont have match winning players whereas liverpool do, but Fergie allways works his magic
References :